"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." -Winston Churchill


It appears that the folks at This American Life have pulled the documentary and are retracting its content declaring it inaccurate and somewhat fabricated. It should be noted that they were not responsible for the content and that they are dedicating an hour program to correcting the misleading information presented in the documentary that aired.
![]() |
Mike Daisey documentary journalist turned entertainer |
He went on to state, “It uses a combination of fact, memoir and dramatic license to tell its story, and I believe it does so with integrity.”
Excuse me? We now call making stuff up and presenting it as fact, integrity?
This is one of those tiny little stories that usually whip by unnoticed but which are representative of the real problem in our society today. Consider the objective of what Mr. Daisey now calls entertainment but was nothing more than a melange of some fact and a lot of fiction. He wanted to create a “human connection between our gorgeous devices and the brutal circumstances from which they emerge.”
Wait a minute. If the “brutal circumstances from which they emerge” were fabricated as “entertainment” rather than journalism, what is the real point of this piece?
I believe that the real point was yet one more example of somebody with a biased opinion blending a bit of fact with a lot of opinionated fabrications to justify and validate their point. There is no dramatic license when you are presenting something as factual about someone or something else. It is either true or it isn't. This was a deliberate attempt to prove a point that was not supported by the facts so…..some facts were made up.
I call it the Wikipedia - Guitar Hero Syndrome or Wikipedia - Guitar Hero Syndrome for short.

This was underscored this past week when Soledad O’Brien, from CNN used Wikipedia as her source for information about Critical Race Theory. That particular Wikipedia entry has been updated no less than 82 times since Ms O’Brien’s shortcut to inaccuracy and being a Harvard graduate, she really should have known better.
I don’t fault Wikipedia, the concept is interesting but we are now the ‘shortcut’ generation. People are looking for quick information, quick resolution and quick instant gratification. In other words, we’re looking for the shortcut to get what we want. Why learn to play the guitar when you can buy Guitar Hero and have your every musical dream fulfilled without any effort or talent required?
Personally, it’s not all that surprising or important except for the fact that the same lazy attitude to attaining what we want is now seeping into all areas of how we think. Why bother to properly research something when we can grab it off Wikipedia in a flash or from any one of thousands of blogs and websites that will support our opinion?
We no longer formulate what we think or believe based on what we are learning or have learned from reliable sources. We pick up our information online from sources that confirm our suspicions and which too often bend facts and even invent some to fit their opinions. In the process we are not only being intellectually dishonest, we are dumbing down society as a whole.
It really doesn’t get much more stupid than presenting a documentary that is full of errors and outright fabrications as factual and then trying to pass it off as entertainment after your caught for sloppy and dishonest journalism.
Mr. Daisey can claim what he likes about his piece now but the simple fact remains. He made no attempt prior to his 'piece' being aired to qualify it as entertainment rather than a fact-filled documentary. It was a dishonest and deliberate attempt to prove a point by misleading those who listened to the piece, a point that doesn't actually exist except in Mr. Daisey's mind and those now of countless people who bought into the misrepresentation.. It slandered a corporation with fabrications and that created the usual tidal wave of uninformed social media condemnation. No amount of rationalization or obfuscation is going to change that.
It's reminiscent of the "Vaccinations Cause Autism" scandal which lead hundreds of thousands to stop vaccinating their children based on a deliberately fraudulent medical study produced in England. To this day, there are still people who believe that vaccinations cause autism even though the study was proven to have been deliberately fabricated to help a pharmaceutical company.
This is the era we live in now, an era where opinion trumps fact and facts can be invented when they don't support our opinions. It's a dangerous business and one of which people need to become more aware.
There was a time when the dissemination of accurate information was almost a sacred trust. That time is gone. Today, we lie to each other but more importantly, increasingly we lie to ourselves.
LINKS
This American Life Retracts Apple Story
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2012/03/16/radios_this_american_life_retracts_apple_story/
© 2012 Maggie's Bear
all rights reserved
The content of this article is the sole property of Maggie's Bear but a link to it may be shared by those who think it may be of interest to others
The intricate tales that we weave. Seems like lies are more fun than truth...the masses get all reved up for a fight about lies and leave truth to sit all by it's lonesome.
ReplyDeleteIt happens every day across social media. The opinion is guided by half-truth and misrepresentation and passed on and on until it becomes its own truth. But I believe that a lie told a thousand times will never become or replace the truth.
DeleteThe media have a lot to answer for.
ReplyDeleteThe sad fact is that generally people aren't interested in stories showing things as they are. The public want scandal and excitement etc and the media are happy to provide it by whatever means.
As far as Social Media goes, I have been caught out a couple of times in the past where I have shared or retweeted something (which, as far as I could see, came from a reliable source) only to find out later that it wasn't actually the case so now I'm very selective about what I share and do some research beforehand. The same goes for Wikipedia. It's a good resource but I would double check or research everything from it before putting it into a document or out in the public domain.
Thoroughly enjoyed reading your post. Thanks.
I think you are right. The Mr. Daisey's attitude used to be confined to the functionally dishonest, opportunists and crackpots. Now it permeates everywhere, including in the mainstream media.
DeleteIt is becoming more and more difficult to find objective, unbiased and reliable resources for information and news.
I've been caught a couple of times too and for that reason, I tend to be careful about information and articles that I endorse. I also tend to be careful about which DMs I answer and attachments I open. A lot of viruses mixed in with the lies.
What stupid things amuse some minds.
Thank you for your comment.