![]() |
| Add caption |
They don’t.
The United Nations are anything but united and the organization has become just one more forum for dictatorships, tyrannies and oppressive governments to legitimize their suppression of human rights through collective support for each other.
![]() |
| Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the somewhat erratic President of Iran |
In a report just released, Human Rights Watch has documented in great detail, the human rights abuses by the Syrian government against its own people. They include imprisonment, torture and murder. Amnesty International and countries around the world have rightly condemned the Syrian government. The United Nations which originally also condemned Syria is now planning to appoint it to the UN Human Rights Council. The hypocrisy is so abject it borders on sheer lunacy or stupidity or both.
It makes a mockery of the very principles upon which the UN was founded and perverts its own stated objectives. Indeed, the pending appointment of Syria would fly in the face of the UN’s own peace plan for Syria but Russia continues to use its veto in the Security Council to block any outright action against the Syrian regime. How would the people of Syria who are fighting for their freedom ever trust the organization that appoints its oppressor to its Human Rights Tribunal?
How indeed; but then, how many anywhere still really trust what the United Nations has become?
It was the United Nations that passed a resolution on November 29, 1947 to partition Palestine and create the state of Israel. Since then, it has allowed member states to attack the state it created both verbally and physically and for no other reason than simply because it exists. The United Nations (including most western democracies) has never come to a resolution for the Palestinian people and the broader organization basically turned its back on them while supporting terrorist organizations like Hammas and Hezbolla.
At a time when poverty in North Korea has become so extreme that its people are literally starving and some have actually been driven to eat grass, the United Nations decided it was Canada that should be criticized by UN food inspectors.
The United Nations invited Robert Mugabe, president of Zimbabwe, to be a guest speaker at the 60th anniversary of its Food and Agriculture Organisation. This was at a time when Mugabe thanks to his bizarre policies could not feed his own people without UN support and is sort of like inviting OJ Simpson to speak to the National Bar Association about crime.
![]() |
| Robert Mugabe, President of Zimbabwe |
At a time when the UN spent just over a paltry $1 million on Kyoto and Climate Change conferences, it was Canada that it chose to criticize for its environmental policies. It doesn’t criticize the world’s largest polluters or emitters of green house gas emissions including China and Russia. Instead it criticizes the smallest emitter; a country with eight of the ten cities with the cleanest air in the world while actually providing money to China despite that country's atrocious environmental record.
![]() |
| The diplomatic bureaucrats of the UN now believe they should have the authority to impose taxes on member nations. |
The United Nations is not a government. It is an organization where member nations were meant to come together to resolve their differences in a peaceful manner. It has no legitimacy for taxation or to govern. It has more than amply demonstrated that it lacks the ability to even govern itself or its own membership. The idea is absurd and yet there will be people who will support it oblivious to the fact that taxation without representation is the road to more corruption.
Increasingly, the United Nations has become a hypocritical perversion of its original intention. It is filled with bombast that has little meaning and virtually no moral authority because it has betrayed its own principles and its rhetoric is empty and seldom followed up with meaningful action. It has been co-opted by China and Russia who have permanent membership on the Security Council and who use their positions to support rogue states like Iran, Syria, North Korea and countless others that oppress their people and suppress human rights though torture, murder and military control.
The world is filled with global organizations today: The World Health Organization, The International Monetary Fund, NATO, The G8 and the G20 to name a few. Judging from the state of the world’s economy, the global security situation, child hunger, global poverty or human rights, none of them have been overly effective.
None, however, has been as ineffective as the United Nations which has become a hypocritical parody of its original purpose. It’s long past time to shut it down or failing that, for countries that actually do believe in human rights and collective security to resign and take their annual funding with them.
The longer countries like Canada and other western democracies remain in the United Nations, the longer we continue to fund the support of oppression by totalitarian regimes through this failed organization.
The United Nations has failed to the point that it is now UN-believable and UN-workable!
© 2012 Maggie's Bear
all rights reserved
The content of this article is the sole property of Maggie's Bear but a link to it may be shared by those who think it may be of interest to others





Many if not most American's would like for the UN to move-- does Canada have a good spot?
ReplyDeleteI'm thinking Inuvik.
DeleteGreetings Bear. You've presented a much needed critique of the UN. I am curious about the perspective from which your criticism of the UN arises. Do you think the world would be better off without the UN? In other words, do you mean to say that international affairs would have progressed better in the absence of the UN?
ReplyDeleteFrom
http://theamericanbookclub.blogspot.com/
I believe that it is important to have an international forum where countries can meet to try and resolve their differences and find common ground. When it works properly, I also believe that countries which have a respect for human rights can be an influence on those which don't. There was a time when the United Nations operated like that.
DeleteThrough organizations like UNESCO, it was not only a meeting place for nations but also provided leadership in areas like global poverty and disaster relief.
Unfortunately, the UN has become like the old League of Nations, highly polarized and politicized. It has been co-opted by totalitarian regimes and those who support them for whatever reason. The result is stasis. The UN has become a parody of its former self, criticizing successful countries and supporting rogue states. Nothing is being accomplished except more polarization and division.
I believe that international affairs will progress more effectively if countries who share the same values come together and unite. I believe that the idea of a global community of nations is past its prime.
When you say, "The UN has become a parody of its former self," I wonder if an attempt can and should be made to stir the United Nations back onto the course of its fundamental purpose? If such a campaign is possible who would be most effective in driving it forward?
DeleteIt seems that the idea of the United Nations lends itself to be potentially more of an asset to humanity than otherwise. For example, the removal of the UN permits ill-willed regimes and states to put most of their skeletons back into their closets. As it is now, for better or worse, international affairs are more exposed. What’s your take on this vantage point?
I believe that once the genie is out of the bottle it is virtually impossible to put it back in. Having successfully co-opted the UN for their own purposes, rogue nations will not be prepared to be more cooperative in the future.
DeleteWhile it may be true that the UN has resulted in rogue nations being exposed for what they are, the simple truth is that it is also the United Nations which has legitimized them. Putting states that have terrible human rights records on the Human Rights Council is absurd. It makes a mockery of defending human rights and leads to mistrust by people who put their faith in the UN.
Likewise, when the UN stands idly by while people are being slaughtered by member states, it provides some protection for those regimes as is seen with Syria and the support it receives from Russian or Iran and the support it is receiving from China.
At the end of the day, rogue nations do not share democratic values nor do they care what we think of them. They use the UN to get support and through that support to strengthen their positions. It is a circumstance that has gone beyond being fixable.
Western democracies are under attack and because they do play by the rules, for the most part, they are hamstrung at the UN. I believe the time has come to realign ourselves with nations that share our values and principles and through that alliance, strengthen our individual nations.
If other countries want to join that new international body, they should be required to earn membership and to adhere to the values and principles of the organization.
Maybe you're right—maybe we cannot stuff a genie back into its bottle, but luckily we are dealing with human beings and their institutions, which have shown a tendency to change and evolve, towards justice and peace and likewise towards corruption and war.
DeleteBeing that these tendencies may in fact be symptoms of humanity’s virtues and vices, isn’t it likely “a new body” would be susceptible to the same political diseases that infected the UN? Perhaps we should view the UN as a sports team with poor members that need to be traded for better players who are more effective in playing their positions. The question in that scenario then would be: who are the general owners?
I sympathize with your frustration concerning the UN’s apparent hypocrisy when you say: “Putting states that have terrible human rights records on the Human Rights Council is absurd. It makes a mockery of defending human rights and leads to mistrust by people who put their faith in the UN.” Well, I couldn’t help but think—“Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.” (John 8:7)
Leaving righteousness aside, I am inclined to think that, however ineffective the UN is according to your appraisal, it provides a first step in the efforts of minimizing international conflict and crimes against humanity. This first step is characterized by Machiavelli (and Cicero) who says “. . . there are two methods of fighting, the one by law ["by discussion" according to Cicero], the other by force: the first method is that of men, the second of beasts; but as the first method is often insufficient, one must have recourse to the second.”
My point is that the United Nations by virtue of its existence encourages—and at the very least it symbolizes—the desire to resolve conflicts by means discussion and a slowly growing respect for a slowly emerging universal law of humanity. This is significant as world history reminds us that war has been the more frequent, if not only, means of settling differences choice prior to the UN’s existence.
Lastly, you assert: “At the end of the day, rogue nations do not share democratic values nor do they care what we think of them. They use the UN to get support and through that support to strengthen their positions. It is a circumstance that has gone beyond being fixable.”
I am not against every political system that do not subscribe to Western democracy. But, hasn’t the number of authoritarian, totalitarian, anti-democratic states decreased a bit in the last century? Indeed, some of them have weathered the 20th century well. Wouldn’t agree that a fundamental culture of freedom is spreading globally?
I would suggest that those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. The UN is based on appeasement rather than upholding the principles on which it was founded. I think it is a little naive, in this day and age, to believe that what is happening at the UN now is actually contributing to a better world.
DeleteIt wasn't the UN who went back into Iraq to bring democracy, it was a US led coalition. It isn't the UN in Afghanistan, it's NATO and it wasn't the UN in Libya protecting the citizens of that country from its oppressive leadership, it was NATO again.
Increasingly the United Nations offers no solutions or protection to anyone. It is becoming irrelevant in a world that is increasingly polarized and dangerous. It is not becoming irrelevant because I say so, it is doing it to itself by attacking those countries that show leadership and supporting those countries who seek to legitamize oppression and political corruption.
If you believe that any of those countries are going to turn over a new leaf and suddenly allow the UN to function the way tt was hoped, you hope in vain.
History has yet to be a broken record, churning out the same exact refrain. While there are recurring themes in history, they are rehashed in different forms and contexts, much like the themes and leitmotifs in Bach’s fugues and Wagner’s operas. History is more like a spiral, whose points do not repeat on the same plane. In other words, there are additions to human understanding and changes in the conditions of human societies and human institutions that must not be ignored—of course I do not mean to say human nature has changed, which may in fact be the theme of human civilization.
DeleteYou are more informed of the United Nations than I am. And, it seems to me that you have all the data you need to conclude that the UN is past the point of recovery. So, perhaps the UN should be abandoned on account of the insightful reasons you proffer.
I just find it a little more difficult than you to dismiss the chronological scale and pace of human history; the United Nations is still but an infant. From this vista, I think the notion of abandoning the UN because it is enduring setbacks, as most evolving entities and systems do, undermines the human drive and resolve for progress, and replaces it with a desperation for quick fixes. Perhaps more importantly to me, it relieves the citizenry of the world of its duty to participate in the shaping of its world for the better.
The United States, for example, has been the bedrock (I guess still is) for many inequalities and injustices. But progress has been made without having to “renew” the Constitution, relative speaking of course.
I'm afraid I don't agree with you on that at all. The current United Nations has eroded into a organization that is even less effective than the the world's first attempt at this, The League Of Nations. The world was smart enough to dissolve the League and try again with the UN. I believe we should learn from that, dissolve the UN and start again. Nothing but the deaths of more innocent people and more global instability will be achieved by clinging to the idea of the United Nations rather than accepting the reality of what it has become.In the end, the worst delusions are the ones we tell ourselves so that we can avoid the hard work of moving forward.
DeleteFair enough! We are in this boat together, and I'm all for moving forward together.
DeleteThe United Nations is a keystone in Mr. Obama's global ambitions. I wrote the following piece in 2009 half believing I was a bit over the top...I have since come to fear how on target I was. http://www.articlesbase.com/satire-articles/chaos-could-that-be-the-real-agenda-1364777.html
ReplyDeleteIt was a very good post but I'm afraid you gave "them" too much credit. You end your post with the words, "The agenda is planned, managed CHAOS." These guys could't manage, let alone plan an agenda. It's made up on the fly after the last poll or latest economic report. It's all about staying in power and letting the next guy clean up the mess. Unfortunately we are getting to a time whne the next guy will have nothing to do except turn out the lights. If you ever feel like contributing to A Bear's Rant, let me know.
DeleteGreаt рost! We ωill be linking to this particulaгlу great post
ReplyDeleteon оur site. Keep up the great wгіting.
Have a look at my website ... how to stop snoring
A fasсinating discussion is wоrth cοmment.
ReplyDeleteI think thаt yоu need to wгite mоre оn this subject matter, іt
maу not be a tabοo matteг but typically people dοn't discuss these subjects. To the next! Best wishes!!
Here is my blog ; payday loans
Wоw, іncrediblе blog layοut!
ReplyDeleteHow long have you been bloggіng for? you makе blogging lοоk easу.
The oveгall lоok of your web sіte іs
еxcellent, let аlone thе content!
Feel free to visit my site - loans for bad credit
І sаνor, cause I dіscovered еxaсtly whаt I was
ReplyDeletehaѵing a lοοk for. You've ended my 4 day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day. Bye
Also visit my site - chlamydia test
Also see my site: chlamydia test
wοnderful iѕsues altogether, you just ωon a logo new reader.
ReplyDeleteWhаt might you rеcοmmenԁ in гegards to your submit
thаt уou simply made some daуs in the past?
Any certain?
Mу ωeb-sіte :: personal loans
My web page: personal loans
Excеllent post. Кeеp ωriting such kind of infоrmаtіοn οn youг blog.
ReplyDeleteIm reаlly imρrеssed by іt.
Thanκs for sharing your thοughts about keyworԁ.
Regards
Stop by my blog payday loans
my page > payday loans
Ηі theгe, I chесk your
ReplyDeleteblοgs оn а regular basis. Yоuг stoгy-telling
ѕtyle is witty, κeep doing what yоu're doing!
Feel free to surf to my webpage ... payday loans no credit check
Hello, Theге's no doubt that your web site could be having internet browser compatibility issues. When I take a look at your site in Safari, it looks fine however, if opening in I.E., it's got some οvеrlapрing isѕues.
ReplyDeleteI sіmрly wаntеd tо givе you а quicκ
heads up! Other thаn that, excellеnt sіte!
Looκ at my web-sіtе: payday loans online
Excеllеnt blog! Do you have аny hints for
ReplyDeleteaspiring writers? Ι'm planning to start my own website soon but I'm
a little lost on evеrything. Would you suggest starting wіth a free platform like Wordpress or go for
a paiԁ option? Theгe are sο many options out theге thаt I'm completely confused .. Any suggestions? Cheers!
my webpage: instant payday loans
I do not drop many responsеѕ, but i did a feω
ReplyDeleteѕeaгching and wound up here "UN-believable! UN-workable!".
Аnd I dο have а few questionѕ for you if іt's allright. Could it be simply me or does it appear like a few of the responses come across as if they are written by brain dead visitors? :-P And, if you are posting on other places, I'ԁ like tо fοllow anything fгеsh you haνe to poѕt.
Wоuld you list of thе cοmplеte urlѕ of
all your shared sіtes lіkе уοuг Facebooκ page, twitteг feed,
or linκеdin ρrоfile?
Hегe is my blog; payday loans uk
What's up Dear, are you in fact visiting this website on a regular basis, if so afterward you will without doubt take fastidious experience.
ReplyDeleteAlso visit my web page :: instant loans
My site - instant loans