Tuesday, 22 November 2011

The Intolerant Democracy of the Great Cloud

The Internet and social networking sites in particular, are the ultimate democracy. It is the ongoing embodiment of what I understand about Occupy’s concept of democracy.  Perhaps that’s a subconscious driver for my lack of comfort with Occupy. For all it’s democratic opportunity, I don’t find social media all that social.

I believe the Internet is dividing us by polarizing us into different, increasingly intolerant camps.

Whether it’s on Twitter, Facebook, My Space or any one of countless other social media, dating and gaming sites, the Internet has given all a forum to voice their opinions whether they are well-informed or not.

Personally, I don’t have an issue with people voicing their opinions, even if they haven’t bothered to take the time to get informed or to back their opinion up with a few real facts. That’s the beauty and the weakness of freedom of speech. Everyone gets to talk. On the Intenet, however, there are no rules. It’s anarchy, sort of like Dodge City before Wyatt Earp showed up and pretty much anything goes.

Instead of using the Internet to gain insight, too many of us use it for confirmation bias. We look for those sites and people who hold and reinforce our opinions. We are less and less open to opposing views and more likely to ignore anything that causes us to question our own opinions.

That in and of itself is a challenge to learning new things but in my mind there is something else that is more troubling. There is a rising level of intolerance across all issues now that prevents us from discussing issues. Now we blame and justify.

Political discussions are a case in point.

Conservatives fire off heated rhetoric attacking Liberals for entitlements and social programs they don’t believe we can afford. They no longer look at the society and offer a balanced approach to making it a better place, it’s simply about winning their point of view. Liberals, for their part, attack the right with an equal amount of fervor, making fun of GOP candidates, attacking corporations and trying to make every entitlement they think of into a human right.

It isn’t restricted to politics.

Pick a topic and throw it out on the Internet and unless it is something nobody cares about, within a very short period of time, people have lined up on one side or the other and quickly turn the discussion into an endless round of accusations, counter accusations, justifications and personal attacks.

And that is another thing about democracy on the Internet. It’s too personal.

It is almost as if we have become so invested in our opinions that any counter opinion or fact becomes a threat to our self-concept. If someone disagrees with me on what I think we should do about the tax system, I don’t consider that a personal attack. I consider it an opportunity to test the validity of my opinion by debating someone else’s.

Unfortunately, too many of us are too concerned about winning rather than learning.  We are not interested in sharing ideas but rather in proving our ideas are better. It is dividing and polarizing us rather than uniting us and as long as we are divided, the major issues with which we all struggle will never be resolved.

Occupy has stated that it wants a democracy that resolves issues by consensus but it’s own version of democracy has only served to polarize the communities in which they operate. It, like the Internet, has not been a uniting force, it has been too divisive.

It isn’t necessarily Occupy’s fault. They, like the rest, are part of this broader context and are caught in the same intolerance as the rest of us.

I don’t advocate shutting down the Internet nor am I particularly in favour of increased regulation of it or censorship but a little self-regulation would be a good thing. The Internet is like a car or a loaded gun. Used responsibly, it has real benefit. Used improperly only to confirm our own bias and pre-conceived ideas, it is a danger to the future of our communities.

Technology is grand but it is only a tool. How we use that tool with each other will determine how tolerant we will be with each other. Without some level of courtesy, respect and tolerance for each other and for differing opinions, we aren’t going to get much done that will be of much benefit.

 © 2011 Maggie's Bear
all rights reserved
The content of this article is the sole property of Maggie's Bear but a link to it may be shared by those who think it may be of interest to others

4 comments:

  1. Technology is now having a pervasive in our lives where everything is revolving around technology. The big question is what happens on a fine day everything ceases to work?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you, technology is pervasive and it isn't just intolerance that it encourages. It also creates a false standard of expectation. Everything has to happen 'now'.The world's problems must be fixed 'now' and when they aren't our impatience allows us to blame those in authority. Unfortunately, while computers and technology may work instantly, some things in the real world are very complex and we need to develop some patience and understanding.

    Perhaps when all the technology does stop working for a bit, we'll go back to listening toe each other rather than merely talking at each other.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well, that might be true for some. But look what I found on that same internet.

    This is what I consulted BEFORE making my decisions regarding "Occupy" - in addition to national news reports.

    For excellent information pertinent to the discussion:
    “The Globalization of Protest” by Professor Joseph E. Stiglitz - Nobel laureate.

    http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/stiglitz144/English

    “Did the Poor Cause the Crisis?” by Professor Simon Johnson – former IMF Chief Economist.

    http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/johnson16/English

    “Boom for Whom?” by Paul Krugman - Professor of Economics and International Affairs at Princeton University – New York Times Op/Ed piece.

    http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/boom-for-whom/?src=tp

    “Inequality Trends in One Picture” by Paul Krugman - Professor of Economics and International Affairs at Princeton University – New York Times Op/Ed piece.

    http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/inequality-trends-in-one-picture/?src=tp

    “Occupy the Agenda” by Nicholas D. Kristof – New York Times Op/Ed piece.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/20/opinion/sunday/kristof-occupy-the-agenda.html?_r=1&src=tp

    “You Can’t Evict an Idea” by Sally Khon – Fox News Opinion piece.

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/11/15/cant-evict-idea/

    “Occupy moves us into a new era” by Linda McQuaig – The Star.com

    http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/1090458–mcquaig-occupy-moves-us-into-a-new-era

    The Exchange: “Eviscerating the Middle Class” by George Packer - in “The Broken Contract” published in Foreign Affairs – discussion with Rob Cox.

    http://www.reuters.com/video/2011/11/03/the-exchange-eviscerating-the-middle-cla?videoId=224224329&videoChannel=2602

    The best minds on the subject, I have found.

    Best Regards, JBS
    jbscanada.net

    ReplyDelete
  4. Excellent comments from each of you and I thank you for sharing them with me and the visitors to my blog. I'll let them decide for themselves what they think without further comment from me.

    ReplyDelete